Graphite Prices Set to Soar, Causing Another Headache for EV Makers

Automakers and battery manufacturers have faced with an eight-fold surge in lithium prices, volatility on the nickel market and political concerns around DR Congo cobalt supply. Many companies have been looking to make downstream deals to secure supply for their ambitious expansion plans. While trading at a fraction of other battery minerals, graphite could make a jump in the near future as well, mounting on the distress of the EV industry.

In contrast to ternary cathode materials, graphite prices have drifted lower this year thanks to weakness in the steel industry, although there have been wide disparities between grades.

China FOB 94-95% purity -100 Mesh sizes are up 31% over the past year, last trading at $765 a tonne, while +100 Mesh prices have been relatively stable over the same period to trade for $890 a tonne. Among the value added products, uncoated spherical graphite (99.95%, 15 micron) has gained 10% in 2022 to average $3,065 a tonne.

Batteries became more than 50% of the cobalt market back in 2016 and the same happened for lithium in 2018. It is expected that next year, lithium-ion batteries will overtake the steel industry as the number one source of demand for graphite.

Graphite demand over the next decade is projected to grow at a compound annual rate of 10.5%, but supply is expected to lag, expanding at only 5.7% per annum, despite a trend of supply diversification, particularly new mining projects coming online in Africa.

By 2025, the battery industry is forecast to consume two thirds of the world’s flake graphite, increasing to 79% in 2030.

The battery can make up 20% to 25% of the total cost of an EV and as the overall cost of batteries has come down, the bill of materials now equals roughly 70% of the cost of a cell.

And while the cathode is the most expensive component responsible for 50% of materials cost in a cell and another roughly 25% for other materials, by weight graphite constitutes 45% or more of the cell.

Need to access the insight?

Start your 7-day free trial now

Need to access the insight?

Start your 7-day free trial now

Need to access the insight?

Start your 7-day free trial now

Do you need to access special insights on this matter?

Start your 7-day free trial  and become a member today

Subscribe to Top Insights Today

Subscribe to Executive Newsletter Top Insights Today

The Executive Newsletter -Top Insights Today- puts global business events in perspective through special insights

Join the ranks of global executives and subscribe to Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today covers insights on energy, clean-tech, oil&gas, mining, rare earths, defense, aviation, infrastructure, manufacturing, electrical vehicles, big-tech, finance and politics of business

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

U.S.’ Westinghouse Set to Build Poland’s First Nuclear Plant

Poland is expected to select Westinghouse Electric to build its first nuclear power plant, while Korea Hydro Nuclear Power (KHNP) may be involved in a project planned by private companies, the Polish Deputy Prime Minister Sasin said on Wednesday. As part of Polish government’s efforts to phase out coal and reduce carbon emissions, Warsaw has been looking for partners to build 6-9 GW of nuclear capacity in the country and provide 49% equity financing for the project. 

U.S. Accelerates Efforts to Develop Domestic Critical Mineral Supply Chain

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a request for information (RFI) for the development and implementation of a domestic critical materials supply chain, including rare-earth elements used in renewable energy equipment. The $675 million Critical Materials Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercialization Program is funded by Biden’s Infrastructure Law. 

Biden Aims to Boost U.S. Critical Minerals Production

Biden prepares to boost domestic production of critical minerals used in batteries for electric vehicles (EV) by adding them to the list of items covered in 1950 Defense Production Act (DPA). The same authority was triggered by Truman to produce steel for the Korean War and by Trump to produce more masks during the first months of the pandemic. 

Stay informed

error: This content is protected !!