Australia’s Woodside gets approval from Mexico to develop Trion oil project

Australia’s Woodside Energy has achieved a significant milestone with the approval of the development plan for its Trion deepwater oil project in Mexico. The approval was granted by Mexico’s oil and gas exploration regulator, paving the way for Woodside to advance into the execution phase of the project.

Woodside holds a 60% stake in the Trion project and serves as its operator, while Mexican state-owned oil company PEMEX owns the remaining 40%. The project aims to tap into deepwater oil reserves off the coast of Mexico, with the goal of achieving first oil production by 2028.

Upon receiving approval for the development plan, Woodside CEO Meg O’Neill expressed enthusiasm for progressing the project with its contractors. This development plan approval allows the company to move forward with the necessary preparations for the project’s execution.

The Trion project was inherited by Woodside in June of the previous year from BHP Group, the world’s largest listed mining company. BHP initially intended to make a final investment decision on the project in 2020. However, due to rising costs and other factors, this decision was delayed, and Woodside took over the project as part of its ongoing growth strategy.

Woodside estimates its share of the capital expenditure for the project to be approximately $4.8 billion, while PEMEX is expected to cover the remaining costs. The project is forecasted to have a peak production rate of 110,000 barrels per day by 2028, and the total extraction of crude is projected to reach 434 million barrels over the contracted period until 2052.

Despite its progress in the Trion project, Woodside has faced criticism from environmental activists and investors concerned about the company’s commitment to climate goals and its investment in oil and gas projects. This has sparked broader discussions about the energy transition and the role of oil and gas companies in a changing global energy landscape.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

CBAM benchmarks signal a harder EU line on high-carbon imports

Brussels is preparing to turn the screw on high-carbon imports. New draft plans for the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) suggest that, from next year, foreign producers of aluminium, cement, fertilisers and, indirectly, steel could face steeper carbon costs than most had pencilled in, as the European Commission tightens the benchmarks it will use to calculate the levy.

From January, CBAM moves from its current “reporting only” phase into one where importers must start paying for the CO₂ embedded in certain carbon-intensive goods they bring into the bloc. In effect, the system extends the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to selected imports: if a tonne of emissions costs EU producers €80 under the ETS, imports should ultimately face a comparable burden, offset by any carbon price already paid at home.

Global FDI faces challenges amid geopolitical tensions

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is facing headwinds globally, impacted by the geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, rising protectionism, higher interest rates, and slow economic growth. According to the World Bank, FDI fell to 1.7% of global output in 2022, down from…

China forces solar shake-out to end price war

China’s second industry ministry conclave with solar manufacturers in as many months confirms that “anti-involution” has moved from slogan to operating policy. Beijing is no longer tolerating loss-making volume for its own sake: regulators are pushing for rules, price discipline and an orderly exit of outdated capacity after a year in which manufacturers reportedly shed a third of their workforces and racked up roughly $40 billion in value-chain losses.

The immediate aim is to stop extreme price wars; the strategic aim is to preserve a globally dominant industry by thinning the herd and lifting margins before financial stress and foreign trade barriers do the job more brutally.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!