Canadian pension fund CPP stepping back from China investments

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments), the largest pension fund in Canada, has laid off at least five investment professionals in its Hong Kong office as part of its decision to scale back its investments in China. Most of those who left were part of the private equity team, and one managing director responsible for the firm’s Greater China real estate portfolio was informed earlier about losing his position.

The departures occurred in August, and the information hasn’t been publicly disclosed until now. CPP Investments has confirmed the layoffs, stating that they were part of ongoing organizational changes and not directly related to their approach to investments in China.

The pension fund has chosen to pause new investments in China, including both direct investments and commitments to China-focused fund managers. This decision is influenced by several factors, including concerns about China’s faltering economic recovery and increasing tensions between China and Western nations. CPP Investments had previously indicated in its annual report that it was reviewing its strategy in emerging markets, taking into account the evolving relationships between Canada, the U.S., and China.

The move by CPP Investments is in line with a broader trend among Canadian pension funds, with others also reducing their exposure to China. In April, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP) shut down its China equity investment team based in Hong Kong. Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ), Canada’s second-largest pension fund, has halted private investments in China and will close its Shanghai office by the end of the year.

These pension funds’ decisions reflect concerns about China’s business environment and the deteriorating relationship between China and Western countries. The ongoing trade tensions and geopolitical disputes have created uncertainty for foreign investors operating in China.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Hormuz has made Asia’s Malacca anxiety feel real again

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has revived an old Asian strategic fear: if one maritime chokepoint can be weaponized, every other chokepoint starts to look less like neutral geography and more like latent coercive leverage. That is why attention has shifted so quickly to the Strait of Malacca.

The waterway is the shortest maritime link between East Asia and the Middle East and Europe, stretches about 900 kilometers, and remains one of the most heavily used shipping lanes in the world. It carries roughly 22% of global maritime trade and, in the first half of 2025, about 23.2 million barrels per day of oil, making it the world’s largest oil transit chokepoint, even larger than Hormuz on that measure. More than 102,500 ships transited it in 2025, up sharply from 2024.

Fossil supermajors lift output into a soft tape, betting on 2026–27

Big Oil is getting ready to pump more, just as prices sag and OPEC+ keeps the taps open. The five supermajors, namely Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, and TotalEnergies, are set to lift output this year and again in 2026, a choice that looks perverse against today’s oversupplied market but makes sense if you believe the squeeze comes later.

Management teams are gaming a late-2026/2027 tightening, arguing that if they don’t sanction barrels now, they’ll miss the upcycle. That view sits behind a broader portfolio pivot: trim buybacks, slow or shelve low-carbon projects with soft returns, cut headcount, and push capital back toward oil and gas developments that still throw off the fattest cash margins.

China’s steel profit rebound looks tactical, not structural

China’s steel sector is seeing a rare improvement in profitability, but the rebound looks more tactical than structural. 64% of Chinese steel mills are now profitable, the highest share since August and only the second time since October 2024 that profitability has moved above this level. The improvement is being supported by firmer downstream consumption, temporary supply restraint from environmental curbs and maintenance, and stronger export conditions since April as overseas mills raised prices.

The recovery is significant because China’s steel industry has spent years under pressure from weak property demand, chronic oversupply and thin margins. The real estate downturn has reduced demand for construction steel, while global protectionism and slowing domestic activity have made it harder for mills to maintain pricing power.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!