Stalling U.S., EU green steel trade talks could mean reimposition of tariffs

Negotiations between the United States and the European Union (EU) for a “green steel” trade deal have reportedly stalled, risking the reimposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from the EU. These talks, which aim to limit imports from steel-producing countries with high carbon emissions and excess production capacity, are part of a broader agreement on sustainable steel and aluminum. Key points include:

Negotiations began in October 2021 following a truce in the US-EU trade dispute over Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum, which had prompted EU retaliatory measures.

Disagreements persist over the structure of trade restrictions to curb carbon emissions and excess production capacity. Differences revolve around the definition of “green steel” and concerns about proposed measures violating global trade rules.

The measures primarily target China, a major global steel producer, which faces concerns over carbon emissions and overcapacity in its steel industry.

If no agreement is reached by the October 31 deadline, the US could reintroduce tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) imports from the EU, triggering likely EU retaliatory tariffs.

The EU favors Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to address carbon emissions in imports. This mechanism requires importing companies to purchase carbon credits for carbon-intensive goods. The US has reservations about adopting a similar mechanism.

Both sides insist on WTO-compliant solutions, but they differ in their approaches to meeting these rules.

Failure to meet the deadline could extend negotiations into the contentious 2024 election year in the US and may face political challenges. The EU also holds parliamentary elections in 2024, which could impact trade sentiments.

The outcome of these talks has significant implications for global steel and aluminum trade and efforts to combat climate change by promoting sustainability in heavy industries.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

China’s Country Garden faces liquidation petition over $205 million loan default

Chinese developer Country Garden is facing a significant setback as it disclosed on Wednesday that a liquidation petition has been filed against it due to non-payment of a $205 million loan. This development not only clouds the company’s prospects for debt restructuring but also undermines…

Western lithium, graphite producers asking premium for sustainable battery minerals

Western lithium and graphite miners are reportedly implementing higher prices for their materials in response to demand from the electric vehicle (EV) supply chain. The move towards premium pricing is driven by the desire for environmentally-friendly and consistent supply alternatives…

EU’s trade pact with Vietnam strains as deficit hits $50 billion

The European Union’s growing trade friction with Vietnam illustrates how global protectionist pressures are reshaping even relationships once seen as mutually beneficial. Since the EU–Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA) took effect in 2019, Hanoi has emerged as the bloc’s largest commercial partner in Southeast Asia, with trade volumes reaching nearly €67 billion ($79 billion) in 2024.

Yet the promise of balanced integration has given way to persistent asymmetry. The EU’s trade deficit with Vietnam ballooned to about $50 billion last year, and data from the first half of 2025 suggest that gap is widening further. For Brussels, this trajectory is politically and strategically untenable, particularly at a moment when trade balances are once again shaping diplomacy.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!