ArcelorMittal considers bid to buy US Steel Corp

ArcelorMittal SA, the world’s second-largest steelmaker, is reportedly considering a potential offer for US Steel Corp, as sources familiar with the matter revealed. This potential move could mark a reversal of ArcelorMittal’s strategic focus after it sold most of its US operations to Cleveland-Cliffs Inc in 2020. The company had been concentrating on expanding in growing markets like India and Brazil. However, it seems ArcelorMittal is discussing a possible offer for US Steel with its investment bankers, though there’s no certainty the bid will proceed.

If ArcelorMittal does decide to make an offer, it could escalate an ongoing bidding war for US Steel. The company already faces competing offers from Cleveland-Cliffs and Esmark Inc, both valuing US Steel at over $7 billion. This potential development underscores the competitive nature of the steel industry and the desire of major players to acquire assets that align with their strategic goals.

The sources providing this information requested anonymity due to the confidential nature of the discussions. Neither ArcelorMittal nor US Steel have responded to requests for comments on the matter.

US Steel workers belong to the United Steel Workers (USW) union, which has endorsed the deal with Cleveland-Cliffs. This endorsement is significant as the union’s collective bargaining agreement gives it a role in the negotiations and the right to counter with its own demands. USW International President Tom Conway stated that ArcelorMittal would be “foolish” to proceed with a bid, emphasizing the union’s support for the Cleveland-Cliffs offer.

This potential development has also impacted the stock market, with US Steel shares initially rising on the news of ArcelorMittal’s bid deliberations, only to pare some of those gains due to the union’s opposition. ArcelorMittal’s considerations come after US Steel announced its exploration of interest from potential acquirers, driven by several quarters of declining revenue and profits amid high raw material and energy costs.

It’s worth noting that this possible move by ArcelorMittal contrasts with its recent focus on reducing its carbon footprint and targeting growth in India and Brazil. As analysts point out, such a bid for US Steel might not align with the company’s recent strategic direction, and cost synergies from the deal might be limited. The situation underscores the complexity of strategic decision-making in the steel industry, where economic, environmental, and competitive factors all play a significant role.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Senate plan to axe green energy credits hands China a strategic win

The U.S. Senate’s latest sweeping budget bill—now hurtling toward a potential vote—has effectively gutted long-standing tax incentives for wind and solar energy, delivering a major setback to America’s clean energy ambitions while introducing, for the first time, a new tax burden on these projects, according to renewable energy advocates.

Since 2005, tax credits have been the cornerstone of federal efforts to stimulate investment in renewable power. Hopes had lingered earlier in the week that senators might rewrite the bill’s provisions to preserve the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) tax incentives or extend their benefits. But in a surprise overnight maneuver, Senate leaders unveiled new language that industry groups say would terminate these vital supports immediately.

U.S. carmakers face breaking point after absorbing Trump tariffs

U.S. automakers have so far shielded consumers from the full brunt of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs on imported vehicles and auto parts, quietly absorbing billions in extra costs rather than risk pricing out buyers. When the tariffs first took effect in April, it was predicted that showroom sticker prices would surge within months.

Yet the average manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) on new vehicles has barely budged, rising less than 1% from mid-March to mid-August, and the price increases accompanying the rollout of 2026 model-year vehicles this autumn have remained modest. In August, brands lifted sticker prices by just 3.3% on average, roughly in line with historical norms despite the extraordinary cost shock.

Stellantis bets $10 billion on U.S. comeback

Stellantis looks ready to re-anchor itself in the American heartland. A two-tranche, roughly $10 billion program, about half apparently already earmarked and another ~$5 billion poised to be unveiled, points to a multiyear push across Illinois and Michigan to reopen plants, rehire, and relaunch models.

On paper it’s an industrial reset; in practice it’s a bet that the U.S. market will reward a sharper, more American product slate (Jeep, Ram, Dodge, maybe a Chrysler revival) and that policy winds from tariffs to emissions rules will make domestic metal more attractive than imports.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!