Equinor, BP want 54% price hike in power produced at three U.S. wind farms

Equinor and BP are seeking a 54% increase in the price of power produced at three planned offshore wind farms in the US. The partners requested enhanced offshore renewable energy credits compared with the terms originally agreed for the Empire Wind 1, Empire Wind 2, and Beacon Wind wind farms, which have a combined capacity of 3,300 MW. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) said that the application would result in a 54% increase in the average price across the projects.

According to NYSERDA, the strike price for Empire Wind 1 would rise from $118.38 per megawatt hour (MWh) to $159.64/MWh, and for Empire Wind 2 from $107.50/MWh to $177.84/MWh. Beacon Wind would see the strike price rise from $118.00/MWh to $190.82/MWh. Equinor and BP argued that “rampant inflation, global supply chain disruptions, and soaring interest rates associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the increasing pace of the energy transition” drove up costs.

Denmark’s Orsted also cited similar pressures when it announced that it may book impairments of 16 billion Danish crowns ($2.3 billion) on its U.S. portfolio. Equinor, however, has not announced any impairments for its U.S. offshore wind business.

A group representing New York’s largest energy consumers responded to the petition, saying that the proposed price amendments would increase consumer costs for the three projects by $14.8 billion over a 30-year contract tenure. The group asked the commission to decline the request, arguing “there are reasons to be skeptical of the suggestion” that the project may be abandoned otherwise.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

EU is preparing for a trade war with China over its industrial core

Europe and China are sliding into an overt trade confrontation, and this time the flashpoint is not cheap toys or textiles but the core of Europe’s industrial base.

A record Chinese surplus with the EU approaching $300 billion in 2025, combined with a four-to-one container imbalance and an increasingly undervalued renminbi, has pushed leaders like Emmanuel Macron and Ursula von der Leyen to declare that relations with Beijing have reached an “inflection point” and that what is now at stake is nothing less than the survival of European industry.

China’s metals mania spreads as retail momentum overwhelms fundamentals

What looks like a “metals rally” is increasingly behaving like a liquidity event that has turned multiple commodity complexes into social-media-driven momentum trades.

The defining feature is not that investors have suddenly discovered copper’s role in electrification or silver’s dual identity as both precious and industrial, but that retail participation, organized through chatrooms and turbocharged by small-sized contracts and options, has become large enough to move prices, overwhelm risk controls, and force exchanges into near-constant intervention.

European energy security at risk amidst Red Sea shipping disruptions

The conflict in the Red Sea, involving missile and drone attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels, is disrupting a crucial trade route and posing a threat to energy supplies for Europe. These attacks, occurring amidst Israel’s conflict with Hamas, have prompted concerns about the future of energy shipments…

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!