U.S., EU discussing new tariffs focused on Chinese steel
- September 8, 2023
- Posted by: Quatro Strategies
- Categories: Europe, Mining & Metals, Sanctions & Regulation, United States
The United States and the European Union are reportedly in discussions to establish new tariffs aimed at addressing excess steel production, with a primary focus on imports from China that are believed to benefit from non-market practices.
While the scope of these measures, including other countries that may be targeted and the specific tariff rates, is still being deliberated, the aim is to curb the impact of steel overcapacity on global markets.
This initiative is part of the broader Global Arrangement on Sustainable Steel and Aluminum, a negotiation that has been ongoing between the EU and the Biden administration since 2021. The goal is to reach a comprehensive agreement within this framework by October 2023.
The 2018 imposition of tariffs by then-US President Donald Trump, which included a 25% tariff on steel imports and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports, was intended to protect domestic producers and led to a significant trade dispute with the EU.
However, in 2021, both parties decided to resolve this dispute and instead focus on the global arrangement. This arrangement aimed to allow limited volumes of EU-produced metals to enter the United States without tariffs while retaining the disputed tariffs on other imports.
The ongoing discussions aim to devise a more comprehensive approach to address steel overcapacity, particularly concerning imports from China. The precise details of these new tariffs and their potential impact on the global steel trade will depend on the outcomes of these negotiations.
Interested in learning more?
Sign up for Top Insights Today
Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.
You will get daily industry insights on
Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.
Read more insights
Brussels targets EU procurement to buy local, low-carbon goods
Brussels is moving toward a more explicitly interventionist use of the EU’s own spending power: Ursula von der Leyen says the Commission will propose public-procurement rules that steer government buyers toward goods that are both made in the EU and low-carbon, arguing that current tendering too often ends up selecting subsidised foreign products even when European alternatives exist.
She framed this as a competitiveness and value-capture problem, that is, public budgets are effectively underwriting industrial activity elsewhere, rather than purely an environmental tweak. The policy is set to be a central element of the Commission’s forthcoming Industrial Accelerator Act, due later this month.
China tries to lock in Gulf FTA as its economic anchor
China is effectively trying to lock in the Gulf as a long-term economic anchor, and using the stalled GCC FTA as the vehicle to do it, at exactly the moment when U.S. and EU policy is turning more protectionist and “de-risking” from China.
The GCC–China free trade agreement talks have dragged on for more than 20 years, conditions are deemed by China as “basically mature”, and Beijing wants a political decision to close. That framing is important. It tells you this is no longer about technical tariff schedules; it is about whether the Gulf is prepared to formalise China as a privileged economic partner at a time of intensifying great-power competition.
Fossil supermajors lift output into a soft tape, betting on 2026–27
Big Oil is getting ready to pump more, just as prices sag and OPEC+ keeps the taps open. The five supermajors, namely Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, and TotalEnergies, are set to lift output this year and again in 2026, a choice that looks perverse against today’s oversupplied market but makes sense if you believe the squeeze comes later.
Management teams are gaming a late-2026/2027 tightening, arguing that if they don’t sanction barrels now, they’ll miss the upcycle. That view sits behind a broader portfolio pivot: trim buybacks, slow or shelve low-carbon projects with soft returns, cut headcount, and push capital back toward oil and gas developments that still throw off the fattest cash margins.