U.S., EU discussing new tariffs focused on Chinese steel

The United States and the European Union are reportedly in discussions to establish new tariffs aimed at addressing excess steel production, with a primary focus on imports from China that are believed to benefit from non-market practices.

While the scope of these measures, including other countries that may be targeted and the specific tariff rates, is still being deliberated, the aim is to curb the impact of steel overcapacity on global markets.

This initiative is part of the broader Global Arrangement on Sustainable Steel and Aluminum, a negotiation that has been ongoing between the EU and the Biden administration since 2021. The goal is to reach a comprehensive agreement within this framework by October 2023.

The 2018 imposition of tariffs by then-US President Donald Trump, which included a 25% tariff on steel imports and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports, was intended to protect domestic producers and led to a significant trade dispute with the EU.

However, in 2021, both parties decided to resolve this dispute and instead focus on the global arrangement. This arrangement aimed to allow limited volumes of EU-produced metals to enter the United States without tariffs while retaining the disputed tariffs on other imports.

The ongoing discussions aim to devise a more comprehensive approach to address steel overcapacity, particularly concerning imports from China. The precise details of these new tariffs and their potential impact on the global steel trade will depend on the outcomes of these negotiations.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

World Bank plans $750 million credit for clean energy projects in Nigeria

The fund for poor countries at the World Bank plans to extend a credit of $750 million for clean energy projects in Nigeria, with the aim of increasing electricity access in Africa’s most populous nation, according to the International Development Association on Friday. As of 2021, over…

Global LNG demand fuels U.S. shale revival as Trump accelerates energy exports

U.S. natural gas producers and private investment firms are pivoting toward the Haynesville shale basin in Louisiana, anticipating a sharp uptick in demand driven by an expansion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports under President Donald Trump. After reversing a moratorium on new LNG projects early in his administration, Trump’s policy shift has reignited interest in upstream development to feed a surge in U.S. gas exports.

With the U.S. already the world’s top LNG exporter, gas prices are rising and new LNG terminals are coming online in Texas and Louisiana. Domestic demand for natural gas is forecast to hit new records in 2025 and 2026. In response, energy producers are positioning to meet that demand—particularly by reviving interest in basins like Haynesville, whose geography and gas composition make it especially well suited for export markets.

Trump’s crude ambitions collide with refining reality

U.S. refiners are showing little appetite for the massive investments needed to retool their plants to process more American crude, presenting a major challenge to President Donald Trump’s push to supercharge domestic energy production and reduce reliance on foreign oil.

Despite Trump’s aggressive promotion of U.S. oil and gas output and his punitive tariffs on major suppliers like Canada and Mexico—ultimately exempting energy imports—the refining industry remains cautious. Industry executives, analysts, and refinery insiders say that most plants are structurally configured for heavier crude, the type historically imported from Canada and Mexico, and not for the lighter shale oil dominating U.S. output today.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!