Russia lifts ban on exports of low-quality diesel

Russia has made adjustments to its recent fuel export ban, lifting restrictions on specific types of fuel, including fuel used for bunkering certain vessels and high-sulfur content diesel. The government document, dated September 23, also indicated that restrictions were lifted on the export of fuel that had already been accepted for export by the Russian Railways and Transneft before the initial ban was announced.

However, the indefinite ban on all types of gasoline and high-quality diesel remains in place. Analysts anticipate that this ban is likely to be short-lived and will be completely lifted after the harvest season ends next month.

The initial export ban, announced on Thursday, encompassed gasoline and diesel, affecting all countries outside a select group of four ex-Soviet states. The primary objective was to stabilize the domestic fuel market. This move followed a notable decline in wholesale prices for diesel and gasoline in Russia.

In recent months, Russia has grappled with fuel shortages and a surge in wholesale fuel prices, even though retail prices have been capped to mitigate the impact of inflation. The fuel scarcity has been particularly acute in parts of Russia’s southern breadbasket, where fuel is critical for the harvest. This situation could pose a challenge for the Kremlin, especially with a presidential election looming in March.

It’s worth noting that Russia had already reduced its seaborne diesel and gasoil exports by almost 30% in the first 20 days of September compared to the same period in August. This export ban was a part of the measures aimed at stabilizing the domestic fuel market and ensuring sufficient supply during a critical period.

QUATRO Strategies International Inc. is the leading business insights and corporate strategy company based in Toronto, Ontario. Through our unique services, we counsel our clients on their key strategic issues, leveraging our deep industry expertise and using analytical rigor to help them make informed decisions to establish a competitive edge in the marketplace.

Make strategic decisions with confidence!

Learn how we can support you in setting the right strategy in a fragmenting global economy.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Platinum and palladium surge as fragile supply collides with tariff risk

Platinum and palladium have roared back into the market’s spotlight, and forecasters are scrambling to catch up. After years of languishing under the shadow of gold and EV hype cycles, both metals have surged, platinum by roughly three quarters and palladium by more than half so far this year, prompting analysts to lift their 2026 price decks materially.

The latest consensus now sees platinum averaging about $1,550 an ounce in 2026, a sharp upgrade from midyear estimates, while palladium’s 2026 median has been lifted to roughly $1,260. The common thread is a supply picture that looks more precarious with each passing quarter, colliding with policy uncertainty and a rotation of speculative capital that has chased gold to records and then gone hunting for the next tight market.

China emerges as oil market swing buyer, capping spikes and floors

China functions as an informal price stabilizer in the global crude market, not through official intervention but through the aggregated behavior of state-linked buyers, refiners, and inventory managers. When prices look cheap, China absorbs surplus barrels into storage and keeps imports firm; when prices rise sharply or feel “too expensive,” it quietly steps back, trims discretionary buying, and switches to discounted grades.

Because cargoes are booked weeks or months before they arrive, the effect shows up in trade data with a lag, which is why this mechanism can be underappreciated even though it can materially shape the market’s floor and ceiling. That framing is plausible, and recent price and flow patterns support it.

Japanese firms lose confidence in China amid economic slowdown and safety concerns

Japanese businesses in China are becoming increasingly pessimistic about the Chinese economy, with a growing number expressing concerns about the challenging business environment and safety issues. According to a recent survey by the Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in China, 64% of Japanese firms…

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!