Australia’s Fortescue stops use of voluntary carbon offsets

Fortescue Metals Group, one of the world’s largest iron ore producers and a significant emitter of greenhouse gases, has taken a bold step by announcing the cessation of its use of voluntary carbon offsets. This move sets Fortescue apart as the only heavy emitter globally to halt the procurement of these offsets. The decision has come amid mounting questions about the efficacy and authenticity of voluntary carbon offsets in achieving substantial reductions in emissions. The annual report published by the mining giant last month highlighted the challenges related to the quality and impact of voluntary carbon offset programs.

In the 12 months leading up to June 30, Fortescue generated a substantial 2.55 million tons of scope 1 and 2 carbon dioxide pollution. The company confirmed that it has commenced implementing a policy to cease purchasing credits from this financial year onwards.

Notably, Fortescue spent $6.2 million in the fiscal year 2023 on voluntary offsets and surrendered a total of 336,833 tons of credits. The voluntary carbon market, despite growing scrutiny and doubts about its effectiveness, is predicted to expand significantly, potentially reaching as high as $953 billion by 2037, according to BloombergNEF.

Fortescue has set ambitious environmental targets, aiming to eliminate scope 1 and 2 emissions (those directly linked to a company’s operations) by 2030.

Additionally, the company aims to phase out the use of fossil fuels at its Australian iron ore sites. These objectives are in line with the emission reduction goals of some of Australia’s major energy producers, such as the local units of Shell Plc and Exxon Mobil Corp.

Despite being a major player in the iron ore industry, Fortescue’s decision to forego voluntary carbon offsets demonstrates a commitment to finding more direct and effective ways to reduce its carbon footprint and contribute to the fight against climate change.

By QUATRO Strategies International Inc.

QUATRO Strategies International Inc. is the leading business insights and corporate strategy company based in Toronto, Ontario. Through our unique services, we counsel our clients on their key strategic issues, leveraging our deep industry expertise and using analytical rigor to help them make informed decisions to establish a competitive edge in the marketplace.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

New Chinese rare earth export licenses snarl chipmaking supply chains

Washington has fired a sanctions shot directly into the heart of China’s crude logistics. A new U.S. package targeting Iran’s oil trade has blacklisted Rizhao Shihua Crude Oil Terminal in Shandong, half-owned by a Sinopec logistics arm, alongside several tankers and a private Chinese refinery.

For Sinopec, the blow is tangible: industry tracking suggests roughly a fifth of its crude imports flowed through Rizhao last year, with three VLCC-capable berths feeding pipelines to core plants inland and along the Yangtze. Even if Sinopec avoids Iranian barrels on paper, the designation snarls a key hub it relies on for clean cargoes, raises legal and insurance risk for counterparties, and forces awkward reroutes to keep refineries supplied.

Economic coercion overtakes war in WEF’s near-term risk outlook

The World Economic Forum’s latest global risk survey is effectively registering a change in what elites fear most in the near term: not tanks crossing borders, but governments turning trade and finance into instruments of coercion. In the WEF’s annual “global risks perception” exercise, drawing on responses from more than 1,300 leaders and experts, geoeconomic confrontation rose to the top of the two-year risk horizon, overtaking state-based armed conflict as the number-one perceived threat.

The WEF’s leadership framed the shift as a world in which tariffs, investment screening, export controls, and resource supply constraints are no longer treated as normal policy tools but increasingly as “weaponry,” deployed to punish, deter, or force alignment.

Europe’s retailers face a fresh energy-inflation squeeze

Europe’s retail sector is being dragged back into an energy-driven cost trap at the worst possible moment: not during a post-pandemic demand boom, but during a period of sluggish growth, stretched household budgets, and already-fragile consumer confidence. The renewed spike in oil and gas prices triggered by the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran is hitting retailers just as they were trying to stabilize after the 2022 energy-inflation shock.

The market reaction of retail equities sliding from apparel to grocers reflects a familiar fear: higher energy costs don’t stay “in energy,” they leak into logistics, store operations, supplier pricing, and ultimately the consumer basket, forcing companies to choose between margin compression and price hikes into weak demand.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!