Chile’s public-private model attracts more than 50 lithium miners

More than 50 global companies are actively pursuing lithium deals under Chile’s new public-private model for the sector. Traditionally, US-based Albemarle and Chile-based Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile (SQM) have dominated the Atacama salt flat, which accounts for 30% of global lithium production. The new model proposed by President Gabriel Boric involves the state having a controlling stake in strategic operations, while private firms retain control of non-strategic projects. The government also plans to negotiate with Albemarle and SQM for larger stakes in their existing contracts, overseen by state-owned copper producer Codelco.

President Boric sees Chile’s lithium reserves as a significant opportunity for economic development and sustainable growth. However, his plan requires approval from the National Congress of Chile, where he lacks a majority, meaning potential changes before approval. Boric’s government aims to establish a new national lithium company through legislation, which could take a substantial portion of his four-year term.

Under the proposed policy, private entities can participate in the lithium industry, but only as minority partners in joint ventures with the State. This approach aims to incentivize the exploration of other salt flats in addition to the Atacama, diversifying lithium sources and expanding production.

SQM, in particular, faces risks, as its contract for extracting lithium in the Atacama salt flat expires in 2030. While Boric assures that existing contracts will be respected, the balance between competing interests remains unclear.

Chile’s push for state control in key sectors reflects a broader wave of nationalization and protectionism in Latin America, exemplified by Mexico’s reforms in the energy and power sectors. While these measures aim to secure national interests, they also raise concerns about maintaining a balance between economic growth, foreign investment, and local development.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

African manufacturers race to save AGOA as expiration looms

African manufacturers are mounting an urgent lobbying push in Washington to keep alive a cornerstone trade deal that has underpinned their access to U.S. markets for nearly a quarter century.

With the African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA) set to expire at the end of September, business leaders from Kenya and several other beneficiary nations have been appealing to Congress for a short-term extension of one to two years, a last-ditch attempt to prevent a tariff shock they warn could devastate their industries.

AI capex boom hits the doubt phase as faith outruns earnings

Investors have finally hit the part of the AI story where faith is outrunning evidence. Two years of astonishing capex announcements from hyperscalers, chipmakers, and power utilities created a reflexive “buy the dip” mentality anchored in the idea that the buildout itself guaranteed future profits.

Now the market is balking. Valuations are stretched, cash buffers at big funds are unusually thin, and the narrative has inverted: each fresh headline about multi-billion-dollar spending lands less like validation and more like a warning about leverage, execution risk, and time-to-payback.

EU delays Russian oil ban, but the strategic direction holds

The European Commission has dropped the April 15 timing for its legal proposal to permanently ban Russian oil imports, but the measure was not cancelled and would still be published later, with the delay explicitly linked to current geopolitical developments.

The delay looks tactical rather than a real reversal of EU policy toward Russian energy. The immediate reason is straightforward: the Iran war has created an extreme global oil shock, and Brussels does not want to launch a politically sensitive oil measure in the middle of the biggest supply disruption in history, as the IEA has described it.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!