EU wants to make joint gas purchases permanent after high demand
- September 6, 2023
- Posted by: Quatro Strategies
- Categories: Europe, Oil & Gas, Sanctions & Regulation
The European Commission is proposing to make its joint gas purchase scheme permanent due to its success. This scheme was initiated by the EU in 2023 after Russia drastically reduced its gas deliveries to Europe in 2022, leading to record-high energy prices in the region. Despite having refilled its natural gas storage to over 90% capacity and a bearish market, the EU is concerned about potential future disruptions in gas supply, such as the Nord Stream 2 explosion that occurred last year. Originally set to expire in December, the Commission is now proposing to make the scheme permanent as part of a broader revamp of EU gas market rules.
Under this proposal, EU companies would have the option to buy gas jointly on a permanent basis. While participation would be voluntary under normal circumstances, if the EU faces a fuel supply crisis, joint purchasing would become mandatory to prevent EU countries from competing for limited volumes of gas.
The scheme has surpassed initial expectations, with more than 27 billion cubic meters of gas demanded, double the 13.5 billion cubic meters initially targeted for joint purchases by the EU. However, it’s unclear how much of this demand has translated into firm contracts, as the EU only matches gas buyers and sellers but is not involved in the commercial negotiations that follow. The new EU proposal would require companies to report when they sign contracts through the scheme.
Negotiations on the proposal will take place between EU member states and the European Parliament, with the aim of finalizing the law by the end of the year. Key discussions will revolve around defining a “supply crisis” that would trigger mandatory joint buying and whether to extend this approach to other energy commodities such as hydrogen. The proposal suggests expanding the scheme to assist the planned European Hydrogen Bank, set to launch in November. Although the joint purchases constitute only a small portion of the EU’s total gas demand, they aim to help countries prepare for winter when gas demand for heating peaks.
Interested in learning more?
Sign up for Top Insights Today
Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.
You will get daily industry insights on
Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.
Read more insights
France, Germany, Poland team up to boost long-range missile capabilities
France, Germany, and Poland announced plans to collaborate on acquiring longer-range precision weapons to address a significant gap in European arsenals, exposed by Russia’s war in Ukraine. The defense ministers from these three countries met in Paris and agreed to establish a procurement mechanism for “deep precision…
Canadian Solar’s Recurrent Energy secures $500 million investment from BlackRock
BlackRock Inc. has committed to investing $500 million in Canadian Solar Inc.’s unit, Recurrent Energy, as part of its increasing focus on renewable power and energy storage. The investment, made through a BlackRock fund, involves purchasing preferred equity in Recurrent Energy, convertible…
Iran conflict turns fertilizer shock into a global food security threat
The war’s impact on fertilizer is becoming one of the most serious secondary economic shocks of the conflict because it threatens food production rather than just energy bills. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the broader disruption of Gulf energy infrastructure are severely tightening fertilizer markets, especially for nitrogen products such as urea, at the worst possible point in the agricultural calendar for the Northern Hemisphere.
About one-third of global fertilizer trade passes through Hormuz, and fertilizer production itself is heavily dependent on natural gas, which can account for as much as 70% of production costs. When gas flows are disrupted and Gulf plants go offline, the effect is immediate: less supply, higher prices, delayed shipments and a direct risk to planting decisions in import-dependent countries.