Exxon focusing on direct air capture of CO2 to reach net zero emissions

Exxon Mobil Corp, the largest U.S. oil company, is investing in technology for direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide (CO2) as part of its low-carbon solutions business. The company views DAC as a critical component in achieving a net-zero future. Direct air capture involves extracting CO2 directly from the atmosphere, a process seen as essential in limiting global warming by organizations like the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Matthew Crocker, Senior Vice President of Product, Strategy, and New Assets in Exxon’s low carbon solutions business, stated that if the high costs associated with DAC can be reduced and the technology can operate efficiently at scale, Exxon could become a major player in the nascent DAC industry. Currently, the costs of DAC range from $600 to $1,000 per ton of carbon removed.

Exxon’s DAC efforts could be bolstered by its carbon capture and storage (CCS) business, which involves trapping emissions underground. The company extended a joint research agreement with DAC developer Global Thermostat to accelerate the development of DAC technology for full-scale deployment.

Exxon’s broader energy transition strategy centers on reducing carbon emissions from its operations and focusing on CCS, hydrogen, and biofuels, rather than investing heavily in renewable energy sources like solar and wind. While the company is investing in reducing its emissions and CCS, it does not plan to invest in building electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, as it believes this isn’t an area where it can bring significant competitive advantage.

By QUATRO Strategies International Inc.

QUATRO Strategies International Inc. is the leading business insights and corporate strategy company based in Toronto, Ontario. Through our unique services, we counsel our clients on their key strategic issues, leveraging our deep industry expertise and using analytical rigor to help them make informed decisions to establish a competitive edge in the marketplace.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Beijing orders strategic retreat from American investment funds

China’s state-backed funds are retreating from investments in U.S.-headquartered private equity firms, reflecting the deepening fallout from the intensifying trade war between Washington and Beijing. The pullback marks a sharp shift in strategy for some of China’s largest institutional investors, who are now either halting new allocations to U.S. firms or seeking to carve out American investments from global private capital portfolios.

The move affects some of the world’s most prominent private equity and infrastructure players. U.S. giants such as Blackstone, Carlyle, Vista Equity Partners, Thoma Bravo, and Global Infrastructure Partners (recently acquired by BlackRock) have all reportedly received backing from Chinese state-affiliated investors in recent years.

Vietnam witnesses surge in coal imports to address power shortages, reassure investors

Vietnam has seen a significant increase in coal imports this year, nearly doubling compared to the same period in 2023, according to customs data. This surge in imports comes as the government aims to reassure foreign investors, especially those operating large manufacturing facilities like Samsung Electronics…

Tariffs didn’t break Wall Street’s hold on Europe, they exposed it

Wall Street’s grip on European investment banking proved far more resilient in 2025 than many policymakers and even some bank executives expected when President Donald Trump unveiled his “Liberation Day” tariff package in April. A common assumption at the time was that European corporates and governments, facing a new layer of U.S. trade friction, might shift advisory and underwriting mandates toward domestic lenders as a matter of political optics or strategic autonomy.

Instead, client behavior largely stayed commercial rather than political: U.S. banks maintained their dominant share of investment banking fees across Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), and in some fee pools, especially equity issuance and M&A, they actually increased their share.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!