Geopolitical risks, supply chain issues take place of sustainability as auto industry priorities

Automakers and suppliers are shifting their sourcing priorities as they deprioritize sustainability initiatives and focus on reducing exposure to geopolitical risks. A survey, which included responses from over 1,000 executives in the automotive industry, revealed a decline of 9-11 percentage points in the number of companies implementing sustainability initiatives such as carbon footprint mapping, route optimization for emissions reduction, and providing detailed production information on origins and manufacturing between 2022 and 2023.

The average investment in sustainability initiatives has also decreased, falling from $36.6 million in 2022 to $30.5 million in 2023. Notably, around one-third of the surveyed companies admitted to lacking a comprehensive sustainability strategy.

The survey results also highlighted a shift in supply chain decision-making priorities. The primary factors influencing these decisions included quality, geopolitical risk, cost, and resilience, with sustainability considerations lagging behind. Companies are emphasizing the need to ensure operational continuity in the face of ongoing supply chain challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, semiconductor shortages, and rising costs.

Furthermore, the survey revealed that roughly 50% of semiconductor supply remains insecure, with full-stack computing platforms and microcontrollers being the most challenging to obtain. Consequently, companies are reducing their reliance on offshore supply sources. The survey noted that the proportion of supply obtained from offshore locations has decreased by over a fifth in the past two years, and another one-fifth reduction in the next two years is anticipated.

The survey suggests that sustainability initiatives are being deprioritized in favor of risk mitigation and enhancing supply chain resilience as companies adapt to the challenges posed by the ongoing supply chain disruptions and geopolitical uncertainties.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

U.S. considers granting $1 billion to Lithium Americas’ Nevada lithium project

The US Department of Energy is engaging in negotiations with Lithium Americas Corp., a Vancouver-based mining company, for a loan amounting to a record $1 billion. This financial injection is aimed at fostering domestic production of critical minerals, particularly lithium, a vital element in the creation of electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, and wind turbines.

SWIFT aims to launch CBDC platform within the next 1-2 years

SWIFT, the global bank messaging network, is planning to launch a new platform within the next one to two years to connect the emerging wave of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to the existing financial system. This initiative is expected to be one of the most significant developments for…

Europe’s critical minerals push now needs its own price architecture

Europe’s push to secure critical minerals is moving beyond the familiar debate over mines, refineries and stockpiles. A more basic problem is now coming into focus: the continent does not control the pricing architecture for many of the materials it needs to build batteries, electric vehicles, wind turbines, semiconductors, defence systems and advanced industrial equipment.

Europe will struggle to attract capital into mining and processing unless it creates its own transparent pricing system for specialty metals and rare earths. Without credible benchmarks outside China, investors cannot properly assess project economics, lenders cannot price risk with confidence, and developers face greater difficulty turning politically important projects into commercially bankable ones.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!