Mining sector having difficulty meeting decarbonization targets

A lack of consistent and transparent data to measure emissions along the supply chain of mining companies is hindering efforts to monitor and meet decarbonization targets within the sector. Mining is a critical industry for supplying the raw materials needed for electric vehicles and renewable energy infrastructure, yet it also contributes to 4% to 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

The challenge lies in the complexity of the supply chain. Mining companies produce metals used in various industries, serving customers across different regions, making it difficult to track emissions across the entire value chain. This issue is further complicated by varying levels of transparency from suppliers.

To address this problem, the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), which includes approximately 25 mining companies, has published guidance for mining companies on how to account for and report their Scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions, such as those originating from third-party suppliers. This guidance aims to create a consistent reporting framework and help companies better account for their emissions.

Many mining companies have set decarbonization targets with the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2040 or 2050. However, some are facing challenges in meeting these targets. For example, Rio Tinto, the world’s second-largest mining company, announced in July that it might miss its 2025 target unless it resorts to purchasing carbon offsets.

Investors are increasingly looking for mining companies to align their targets with net-zero goals across all scopes of emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) and to set clear short, medium, and long-term targets to demonstrate their commitment to reducing emissions. The challenge for the mining industry lies in ensuring the entire supply chain adheres to these goals, as emissions reductions depend on actions taken by suppliers and partners throughout the value chain.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Strong earnings keep stocks up despite oil and war anxiety

Global markets are still behaving as though the Iran war is serious but manageable, with investors choosing to focus on earnings strength and the AI-led profit cycle rather than fully repricing the geopolitical shock. Stocks rose on Tuesday, with the S&P 500 up 0.6%, the Nasdaq up 0.9%, and Europe’s STOXX 600 up 0.5%, as strong results from companies such as Anheuser-Busch and UniCredit helped offset renewed concern over Gulf hostilities.

At the same time, Brent crude remained extremely elevated at $111.27 a barrel even after pulling back from levels near $115 the day before, when renewed fighting pushed prices sharply higher. The immediate market message is that investors are still splitting the world into two separate stories.

Saudi Arabia likely to raise crude prices for most grades sold to Asia in June

Saudi Arabia, the top oil exporter, is likely to raise prices for most of the crude grades it sells to Asia in June to their highest levels in five months. The June official selling prices (OSPs) for flagship Arab Light crude may increase by 70 to 90 cents, reaching close to a $3 per barrel premium to the average of…

Japan Inc. puts geopolitics first, profits second as it plans for 2026

Japanese boardrooms are heading into 2026 with geopolitics, not economics, at the top of their worry list. A new survey shows that the single biggest concern for Japanese companies is the sharp deterioration in relations with China, followed closely by uncertainty over U.S. trade policy. That ordering is striking in itself: for corporate Japan, the two countries that matter most commercially are also now seen as the main sources of strategic risk.

Relations with Beijing have been sliding since Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told parliament that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could trigger a Japanese military response. That statement effectively made explicit what had previously been left deliberately vague, and it has fed into a series of tense incidents at sea and in the air. The latest flashpoint came when Tokyo accused Chinese fighter jets of locking radar onto Japanese military aircraft, an allegation Beijing disputes.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!