Offshore wind developers want the U.S. to ease subsidy requirements

Developers of U.S. offshore wind projects, including Equinor, Engie, and EDP Renewables, are urging the Biden administration to revise the requirements for subsidies under the year-old Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA mandates that clean energy projects seeking bonus tax incentives must utilize American-made equipment and be situated in low-income communities.

While these provisions align with President Biden’s goals of boosting U.S. manufacturing jobs through clean energy investments and directing 40% of these benefits to disadvantaged areas, they pose significant challenges for offshore wind projects.

The primary issue is that the offshore wind sector heavily relies on foreign equipment and materials, and offshore installations are located in U.S. coastal waters. The IRA’s strict domestic content requirements, such as the mandate that offshore turbine towers must be made entirely of domestic steel, are difficult for the industry to meet. Furthermore, the first factory that could produce such components in the U.S., located in New York, is facing delays and cost overruns, making it impossible for developers to comply with the IRA’s demands.

The offshore wind industry already has more lenient requirements for claiming the bonus compared to other sectors, with domestic content accounting for just 20% of costs, as opposed to 40% for solar and onshore wind, according to Treasury rules. Developers are requesting more flexibility regarding the location of the domestic content and are advocating for the consideration of port infrastructure locations that can provide jobs and economic benefits to a broader area.

Despite these challenges, the U.S. Treasury is determined to implement the IRA’s subsidies in a manner that aligns with the law’s goals. It asserts that the IRA has already spurred billions of dollars in new investments and emphasizes that its approach aims to incentivize investment in a U.S. clean energy supply chain over time.

Labor unions, a crucial constituency for President Biden, have been advocating for stringent requirements for the domestic content bonus. The White House has stated its commitment to advancing American offshore wind opportunities, highlighting the industry’s role in creating thousands of union jobs in manufacturing, shipbuilding, and construction.

While the offshore wind industry acknowledges the importance of the domestic content requirements for the IRA, it argues that some adjustments are necessary to facilitate the projects’ development. These adjustments are not only vital for the success of individual projects but also for the growth of the domestic offshore wind industry and the jobs it can create. Developers believe that striking the right balance is crucial to avoid hindering the industry’s expansion and the attainment of clean energy goals.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Philippines looks to US and allies for support in South China Sea energy exploration

The Philippines is looking to leverage its deepening security ties with the United States into broader economic gains, particularly in the context of exploring energy resources in the disputed South China Sea. According to Jose Manuel Romualdez, the Philippine Ambassador to the US, the country…

World on edge as U.S.-China trade war threatens global recession

Governments and central banks around the world are mobilizing rapidly to shore up their economies amid mounting fears of a global downturn, as the United States and China continue to escalate a high-stakes trade war.

From Asia to Europe and North America, policymakers are cutting interest rates, launching subsidy packages, and promoting domestic consumption in a bid to cushion the economic impact of intensifying tariff battles. The growing alarm comes in response to President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy—culminating in a 145% tariff on Chinese goods—and Beijing’s equally forceful retaliation, now imposing 125% tariffs on U.S. imports.

UK-India trade deal marks strategic shift as global tariff wars escalate

The free trade agreement (FTA) between Britain and India marks a pivotal moment for both countries’ trade strategies, offering a pragmatic response to the growing volatility of the global trade environment, particularly under the pressure of U.S. tariffs. Finalized after three years of intermittent negotiations, the deal carries both symbolic and economic significance, even if its immediate economic impact may be modest relative to the size of each economy.

The backdrop to this agreement is one of global protectionism. U.S. President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs have disrupted global trade patterns, prompting countries to hasten bilateral deals to hedge against American unpredictability. The UK-India deal is emblematic of this trend, as negotiators reportedly cited Trump’s tariff war as a catalyst for pushing the agreement over the line.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!