U.S., G7 see China’s economic problems as systemic

The economic challenges facing China are raising questions about its ability to continue its rapid growth and ascendancy as a global superpower. US and other Group of Seven (G-7) nations are increasingly viewing China’s struggles as indicative of deep-seated structural problems that could weaken its geopolitical influence and strengthen the position of Western nations.

While China once appeared to be on an unstoppable trajectory to surpass the United States as the world’s leading economic power, the prevailing sentiment in Washington and other capitals is shifting. The dominant economic narrative, which guided global capital flows for decades, is changing rapidly.

China’s economic slowdown, characterized by issues such as high debt levels, demographic challenges, soaring youth unemployment, and a collapsing real estate sector, has raised concerns about its long-term growth prospects. President Joe Biden referred to China’s economy as a “ticking time bomb,” and US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo noted that American companies are increasingly finding China “uninvestible.”

The growing view is that China may be approaching a peak in its economic power, even if it is not yet in absolute decline. This perspective has been quietly gaining traction within the Biden administration.

US officials believe that China has made a strategic mistake by resisting calls to open its economy further. While it is too early to definitively conclude that China is peaking or has peaked, long-term structural issues are seen as potential brakes on its growth. China’s policies, which create a less favorable environment for foreign investment and companies, are also contributing to these concerns.

The economic challenges facing China are not limited to Washington. G-7 countries are contemplating the impact of China’s woes on their own markets, particularly as China has been a major driver of global economic growth. Some are concerned about the consequences of weaker Chinese demand and its effects on the global economy.

The shift in sentiment is also affecting Western policies, even though officials insist that they do not yet see a need to change course. The Biden administration’s recent limits on outbound investment in China were relatively weak and narrowly focused, partly due to lobbying by US investors. Additionally, the administration believed that China’s own hostile policies and economic strains were more effective in discouraging investment than US restrictions.

While officials argue that China’s slowdown validates their efforts to reduce dependence on the country and reassess trade, investment, and industrial policies, they acknowledge that China remains a formidable challenger in many strategic sectors. Therefore, Western nations are focused on strengthening alternative supply chains and bolstering their industrial policies.

In summary, China’s economic challenges are leading to a shift in the global economic landscape. While the narrative of China’s unstoppable rise is evolving, it is clear that China will remain a formidable economic rival for years to come. The implications of China’s economic struggles are far-reaching, impacting global markets, trade policies, and geopolitical dynamics. The key question now is whether China’s economic difficulties will lead to a more belligerent or more accommodative China on the world stage.

Elevate your business with QU4TRO PRO!

Gain access to comprehensive analysis, in-depth reports and market trends.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for Top Insights Today

Top Insights Today delivers the latest insights straight to your inbox.

You will get daily industry insights on

Oil & Gas, Rare Earths & Commodities, Mining & Metals, EVs & Battery Technology, ESG & Renewable Energy, AI & Semiconductors, Aerospace & Defense, Sanctions & Regulation, Business & Politics.

By clicking subscribe you agree to our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions of use.

Read more insights

Saudi Arabia’s oil output pivot meets short-term market tightness, but risks loom

Saudi Arabia’s recent pivot from years of coordinated production cuts to a strategy of increasing oil output appears to have landed at a moment of market alignment. Despite global concerns about economic slowdown — amplified by U.S. President Donald Trump’s escalating trade wars — the oil market is signaling that current supply remains tight, especially heading into the peak summer demand season.

In recent weeks, Riyadh pushed OPEC+ members to lift production, resulting in a cumulative increase of nearly 1 million barrels per day (bpd) from April through June. Yet oil prices, rather than collapsing in the face of more supply, are responding with a complex curve structure reflecting a blend of short-term tightness and medium-term softness.

China’s October shipments slip back into contraction

China’s October trade print was a cold dose of reality for a country trying to outrun tariffs and weak global demand. After months of hustling orders forward to beat new U.S. levies, exports slipped back into contraction, underscoring how deeply Chinese manufacturing still leans on American consumers even as Beijing courts Europe and Southeast Asia.

The customs data show the whiplash clearly: a sharp swing from September’s solid growth to a year-on-year decline, with shipments to the U.S. plunging and only tepid gains elsewhere. The front-loading window has closed; the pipeline is thinner; and the yuan softened as traders marked down the outlook.

Hedge funds top $5 trillion as investors hunt shelter from policy shocks

Money is flowing back into hedge funds at a pace not seen since before the global financial crisis, lifting industry assets to an unprecedented roughly $5 trillion. The latest quarter through September delivered the strongest net subscriptions since 2007, complemented by performance gains that averaged about 5.4% across strategies, with equity long/short and macro funds setting the tone.

The appeal is straightforward: after a year of abrupt policy shifts, tariff volleys, and geopolitical flare-ups, investors are hunting for returns that zig when public markets zag. Equity beta helped, but just as important was the chance to monetize dispersion, rates volatility, and currency swings that have defined this year’s cross-asset tape.

Stay informed

error: Content is protected !!